The return of
the "small shareholder"
There is no need
to revise the
decision of Chapter 5.
No need to
assume
the existence of
phenomena that
are not causal.
We didn’t make a
mistake when
we accepted that
Natural Law has
absolute validity.
The
Natural Law itself contains the inaccuracy,
allowing for the freedom in the universe,
without which we wouldn’t be able to understand it.
The Natural Law
holds
100%
"power" over the World.
However it doesn’t
determine
what will happen with
the same
percentage of accuracy .
The "small
shareholder",
whom we mentioned
in Chapter 4,
and who allows that what will happen
to be not strictly determined, he does
really exist.
But he is no
other
than the Natural Law
itself.
Nothing is going to happen that was not foreseen by the Natural Law.
There is
no part of nature that is not controlled by the Law.
But the Law is somewhat flexible,
it allows a small
percentage
of freedom.
What will happen
is not completely
predetermined by the Law.
It is determined
with great accuracy
but not with an
accuracy of 100%.
In the details
it is only
approximately
predetermined.
It can develop
either this way
or that way.
It can freely
follow
either direction.
For this
decision, whether the phenomenon
will develop in the one or in the other direction,
no reason is required.
Both
directions are "legitimate and
equal in the eyes of the Law".