An interesting question
The fact that we can continually improve the accuracy
of our predictions could lead us to the question:
right, we are ignorant and incapable.
Therefore we cannot accurately describe the
Natural Law and our predictions are inaccurate.
How accurately, however, can the Natural Law
determine what will happen?
This question seems to be superfluous,
because the answer is rather obvious:
Didn’t we agree
that every event
in the Cosmos
takes place under its leadership?
We will not discuss other
It is not the responsibility of Physics to do this.
If the Natural Law determines only approximately what happens,
if it does not govern one hundred per cent of the
if it is, say, responsible only for 99% then who defines
the remaining 1% ?
And one more thing:
If there existed this
little non-deterministic percentage,
not controlled by the Natural Law (what is inevitable we
have already calculated to be 99%), would it always
be constant or could it change from phenomenon
Could it perhaps become 10% or 50% or even more?
Then there must be phenomena
where, no matter
how clever we are at looking,
we will never find their determinism.
Maybe we can find a part that is deterministic,
but the rest is uncontrolled!
It will remain forever mysterious
and will appear at
one time in one
form and next time in another.
Not being subject to determinism
it would not be obliged to appear
always in the same form.