How easy is it for
democracy to be realised?
But if such a system has so many
benefits and could easily be realised,
why hasn't it been implemented yet
in some country or at least proposed?
countries are ruled by parties and
politicians and such a system of direct democracy
(the people making the decisions and some
experts performing the task of government)
will make both
parties and professional
They were used to
people and governing in his name.
could they accept that they had
suddenly become completely useless?
They know that
they possess the
real power and
have no inclination to hand it over.
that human society
could not function
without this special caste to which only
they have the privilege of belonging, and
which was designated by God to guide
and to rule the masses of incompetent
and stupid people.
Each herd needs his shepherd.
We cannot hope
that a government
or a party
will appear before the people
have prepared a system that has
only advantages, but which makes us, the
politicians, obsolete. We will now step down.
Good luck for the future".
The opposite will happen.
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>Every government,
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>every party,
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>every politician
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>will fight and
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>struggle
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>with all the means
at his disposal
against such a system,
against even the slightest thought of it.
This will be a struggle for existence.
If we aim
direct democracy, we must
realise that we will be facing very strong
It is not just politicians and parties.
It is the entire state apparatus,
that is in the hands
of the politicians and parties.
And it is not only that.
Huge economic interests,
dependent on the
are interwoven throughout it.
decides how much of the budget
(i.e. of the people’s money)
is used for what purpose
(i.e. in whose pocket it will end up).
These large financial interests
are dependent on the government,
but the government itself
(i.e. the parties
and the politicians
who form the government)
depends on the same
great financial interests.
fact the two of them, parties
and big business, share power.
for direct democracy
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>politicians,
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>parties,
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>parliaments and
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>all that is connected
to the current representation of the people.
it also abolishes
the relationship that has
been established between the large
financial interests and the state.
We will have therefore
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>not only politicians,
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>parties and
<![if !supportLists]>• <![endif]>the state
We will have also the major economic interests.